GDPR · 5 min
GDPR and automated decisions: the rule that constrains your AI
Article 22 GDPR quietly governs a large share of AI deployments. Ignore it and your model becomes a legal liability.
Automated decision-making with legal or similarly significant effects is restricted under GDPR, and a surprising range of AI use cases, credit, pricing, hiring, fraud, fall within it.
Lawful basis is the first gate. Without a valid basis for automated decisions, the deployment is exposed regardless of accuracy or intent.
Data subjects have rights to meaningful information, to contest decisions and to human intervention, and those rights must be operational, not theoretical.
The AI Act now layers on top, adding governance and transparency duties for higher-risk uses that overlap heavily with Article 22 scenarios.
Treat automated decision-making as a design constraint from the start, and your AI stays deployable. Bolt it on later, and you rebuild the pipeline.
Ещё материалы
The AI Act is live: what boards must actually do now
The EU AI Act's obligations are phasing in. The companies that treat it as a governance programme, not a one-off legal review, will move fastest.
MiCA in practice: classifying your token before it classifies you
Under MiCA, the legal nature of a token determines the entire compliance path. Classification is not a formality, it is the strategy.
NIS2 puts cybersecurity on the boardroom balance sheet
NIS2 extends cybersecurity duties deep into industry and infrastructure, and holds management personally accountable for failures.
Начнём разговор
Расскажите, что вы создаёте.
Будь то ИИ в продакшене, структура токенов, заявка на лицензию или переход завода в цифру, мы поможем построить это на прочной правовой основе.